Whenever we are in nature, in the field, in the mountains, or in any natural setting, ie, away from civilization, in contact with wild fauna and flora, clean air and other ecological delight with which we enjoy we move outdoors, it is logical that we try to avoid any possible negative impacts that harm the environment we cherish, transforming it from a little in that of which we can always escape: the city and pollution.
Catch-and-release is not only becoming popular in angling circles in U.S., it’s becoming an important fishing philosophy in many countries. Catch-and-release lets anglers enjoy their sport but not diminish the resource.
But PETA, PISCES and other anti-fishing organizations claim this approach is still cruel and that the fish suffers tremendous traumatic and physical effects.
Here’s their propaganda: “It is easy to see that angling causes suffering to fish regardless of whether or not the fish is returned. Traumatized and injured fish returned to the water can either die from injuries, or from stress of being caught. Further, fish take time to recover from being caught and during that time are extremely vulnerable to attack and damage from the physical environment…”